ד”ר סטנלי פלוטקין – ניסויים בבני אדם

Experiments on Human Subjects

Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of modern vaccines. January 11, 2018 deposition of Dr. Plotkin by Attorney Aaron Siri, on behalf of Lori Matheson, in her battle to protect her daughter from forced vaccination, which her divorced husband wanted done. (Schmitt vs Schmitt) Dr. Plotkin was going to be an expert witness on behalf of Mr. Schmitt. After the 8 hour deposition by Mr. Aaron Siri, Dr. Plotkin chose to recuse himself.


Peter Hotez: Hero of One Spooky Dude

Holy encephalitis Batman!!

Arthur Caplan’s synopsis of Peter Hotez’s book “Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel’s Autism.”

“In 1994, Peter J. Hotez’s nineteen-month-old daughter, Rachel, was diagnosed with autism. Dr. Hotez, a pediatrician-scientist who develops vaccines for neglected tropical diseases affecting the world’s poorest people, became troubled by the decades-long rise of the influential anti-vaccine community and their inescapable narrative around childhood vaccines and autism. The alleged link between the two was first espoused in a fraudulent scientific paper, long since retracted, but the story shows no signs of letting up. As a result, we’ve seen deadly and disabling outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases around the country, and Texas, where Hotez lives, is at particular risk.
In Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel’s Autism, Hotez draws on his experiences as a pediatrician, vaccine scientist, and father of an autistic child. Outlining the arguments on both sides of the debate, he examines the science that refutes the concerns of the anti-vaccine movement, debunks current conspiracy theories alleging a cover-up by the CDC, and critiques the scientific community’s failure to effectively communicate the facts about vaccines and autism to the general public, all while sharing his very personal story of raising a now-adult daughter with autism.

“A uniquely authoritative account, this important book persuasively provides evidence for the genetic basis of autism and illustrates how the neurodevelopmental pathways of autism are under way before birth. Dr. Hotez reminds readers of the many victories of vaccines over disease while warning about the growing dangers of the anti-vaccine movement, especially in the United States and Europe. A former US Science Envoy for the Department of State, he also explains what’s at stake if the movement continues to gain ground. Opening with a foreword by leading medical ethicist Arthur L. Caplan, this book is a must-read for parent groups, child advocates, teachers, health-care providers, government policymakers, health and science policy experts, and anyone caring for a family member or friend with autism.

“When Peter Hotez–an erudite, highly trained scientist who is a true hero for his work in saving the world’s poor and downtrodden–shares his knowledge and clinical insights along with his parental experience, when his beliefs in the value of what he does are put to the test of a life guiding his own child’s challenges, then you must pay attention. You should. This book brings to an end the link between autism and vaccination.”–from the foreword by Arthur L. Caplan, NYU School of Medicine”

And who is Arthur Caplan?

Parental Rights according to Professor Caplan

“If the parents won’t do it, I think it’s the responsibility of the state or the government to do it,” said Caplan. “The presumption should be not listening to what parents who don’t want to vaccinate are saying, but starting out with a presumption that kids have a right to fight off deadly diseases, that kids who can’t be vaccinated have a right to protection. How do we move public policy forward from there?”

Reference: Caplan AL. Do Children Have Vaccination Rights? Medscape Oct. 22, 2018.

Parental Rights as traditionally viewed in American jurisprudence

“But it is precisely this ‘long held legal right to make informed, voluntary decisions about pharmaceutical products and medical procedures that carry risks for their children,’ says Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), that is ‘all that stands between parents and exploitation of their children by those in positions of power in society with a personal or professional vested interest in forcing every child to use pharmaceutical products that are not safe or effective for every child.’

For more on the increasing encroachment on parental rights to protect their children from pharmaceutical exploitation:

Vaccine Wake Up Call for Parents: Your Children Are Being Taken

The deeper I dig, the worse this nightmare gets. We go from one bad actor to a worse actor in this battle between parents and undue interference from pharmaceutical giants, aided and abetted by a corrupt medical industry and even more corrupt governments. Well. It’s tough at this point to tell who is more corrupt. Or who is who? Are we governed by legislators or the drug industry? Are doctors healers or drug salesmen?

Peter Hotez – Useful Idiot

Washington DC, 4 March 2019:

After a press conference in Washington DC, Peter Hotez engaged in a brief discussion with several mothers, some who have vaccine injured children. During the discussion, Hotez condescendingly called these mothers “useful idiots”, and blamed their views on being suckered in by “misinformation.” Hotez also claimed babies receive passive immunity against measles from their vaccinated mothers for up to 6 months of age.


A well nourished mother who had measles as a child passes a robust immunity on to her baby, via placenta and breast-feeding, for up to a year — or longer.

There are caveats to this of course, the first being “well fed.” Throughout history, societies who insure their mothers and small children receive the best foods are the societies with the healthiest outcomes.

The second is an unmedicated birth, with delayed cord clamping.

The third is exclusive breast-feeding for as long as baby prefers.

An infant who isn’t afforded those advantages is at increased risk of measles and complications. There are options, even in those cases…I’ll get to that. Rather than running for the needle, or for over-the-counter meds, young mothers are better served by learning traditional ways of mothering, of finding health care providers that respect how our bodies are designed, and how to work with the immune system rather than manipulating it.

Vaccine induced passive immunity is weak and short-lived, which is why boosters are required. Public health officials are in a panic because they know the MMR is a failing vaccine, as is evidenced by the increasing incidence of measles among vaccinated populations, sometimes 100% vaccinated. They know that babies born from vaccinated mothers are at risk of measles before 6 months.

This terrible state of affairs is what the vaccinators have brought upon us. Prior to the vaccination era, death rates from measles had been reduced to 1:10,000 children. Babies under one  rarely got the measles, and measles in adults was almost unheard of. The burden of incidence was in the safest population, school-aged children. Once that child recovered, her or she had lifelong immunity.

In older children, measles is normally a self-limiting, benign childhood infection. For more information on how to manage routine childhood illnesses, Dr. Thomas Cowan’s “Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness” is an excellent source. Another great source to help us all calm down is Dr. Larry Palevsky.

Let’s crack open what is easily the best book written on the subject of childhood vaccines, “Dissolving Illusions” by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk

“Now that children who were vaccinated in the 1970s and later are of childbearing age, accumulating evidence shows that infants are not as well protected as they were when measles circulated widely, infecting nearly every child by the age of 15. Today the only solution to the issue of waning vaccine immunity is to keep vaccinating and to vaccinate childbearing-age mothers again. But this will always carry more risk than letting the disease circulate and be dealt with normally by T cells in well-nourished populations. Because the morbidity and mortality associated with measles is most severe among infants, the early loss of passive immunity demonstrated in recent studies of vaccinated mothers {677} should be of major concern.

“Today, because of vaccination, young infants are more susceptible than ever. Scientists are searching for ways to vaccinate them and bypass the vaccine neutralization that comes from placental and breast milk immunity.{678} Why? That immunity protects the infant from measles. This is just another example of how vaccines have created a situation that requires even more vaccines and more manipulation of the immune system. This is financially efficient for vaccine manufacturers but scientifically and immunologically unsound.”

{677} Ohsaki et al., “Reduced Passive Measles Immunity in Infants of Mothers Who Have Not Been Exposed to Measles Outbreaks,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 31, pp. 17–19.

{678} Kim et al., “Insights into the Regulatory Mechanism Controlling the Inhibition of Vaccine-Induced Seroconversion by Maternal Antibodies,”

According to “Physicians for Informed Consent” we read about the attendant risks of this vaccine culture being foisted and forced on us and our children:

“Common side effects of the MMR vaccine include fever, mild rash, and swelling of glands in the cheeks or neck.  A more serious side effect is seizure, which occurs in about 1 in 640 children vaccinated with MMR2—about five times more often than seizure from measles infection. {2}

Physicians for Informed Consent MMR

{2} Vestergaard M, Hviid A, Madsen KM, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Schendel D, Melbye M, Olsen J. MMR vaccination and febrile seizures: evaluation of susceptible subgroups and long-term prognosis. JAMA. 2004 Jul 21;292(3):356.

What about those other options for mothers who didn’t know to not clamp the cord, or who had a less than optimal birthing experience, or who aren’t or can’t breast feed? The following link offers guidance for those who do catch the measles: Vitamin A


Thanks for the List!

It has come to my attention that a blog based in Australia has compiled a 13 page list (and growing) of “anti-vaxxers” who the author deems as promoting child abuse and child neglect by promoting their “beliefs.” Why thank you. I now have a 13 page list of potential vaccine risk awareness activists to work along side.

The list can be found here: https://allaboutantivaxxers.wordpress.com/av-name-check/

Calling all risk awareness activists: Print out as quickly as possible. This list might be a violation of WordPress’s TOU. After all, why do we need to know the location of a private individual if we can debate him or her online? Answer: We don’t. It’s a violation of that person’s privacy and might put him or her in danger by an unhinged pro-vax fanatic.

We need to keep the debate civil fellow WordPress blogger. Listing a person’s name and location without their permission is uncivil. We all know this. This list of yours might be termed “universally unacceptable behavior.” By listing people’s names and locations on a public blog, expressing opinions on a debatable subject becomes dangerous, which is the beginning of the breakdown of civil debate, ergo the beginning of the breakdown of civil society.

Philip Gluyas***, your views, while well meaning — you obviously care about children — as do vaccine risk awareness activists, are misguided and uninformed.

***Since Philip Gluyas is posing in a photo with the very public figure, Victorian Health Minister, Jill Hennessy, I figured he wouldn’t mind me mentioning his name.

The New Religion of Peer-Review

Jeffrey Jaxen has given me my reply to the sanctimonious comments I’ve often heard, “I only use evidence-based, peer reviewed studies to inform my health care decisions.”
Really? Read much?
I propose two strategies that will bring about a better, more timely outcome when wading through the reams of information in your decision-making process. You won’t have to wait 30 years and watch countless people suffer and die, or become a cautionary tale yourself, to better know your answer:
1. Go with overwhelming eyewitness reports, for example, the epidemic of autism. It works in a court of law. There are thousands of parent eye-witnesses. Ask them what they think. Too many parents are witnessing the destruction of their children, and too many of them have the same story, to chalk it all up to coincidence. They didn’t put their heads together in a secret meeting (think CDC) to cook up a nefarious, anti-vax conspiracy in order to bring down Western Civilization as we know it.
2. Learn how your body works. Anything that disrupts basic human biology is probably something to approach with caution. Risk benefit analysis needs to be done soberly.
As an example, in the case of statins (one of my favorite drugs to despise) they block the critical mevalonate pathway. They block nutrients the body makes to nourish — wait for it — THE HEART!! And so statins weaken the heart, sometimes irreversibly, with no known medication that can bring that weakened heart back to health. The condition statins are supposed to treat, blocked arteries, is reversible with proper nutrition, exercise, and targeted supplements.
The use of statins makes vibrant health impossible. No studies have shown they save lives or extend lives by more than maybe a day or two. Read Dr. Malcolm Kendrick’s book “Fat and Cholesterol Don’t Cause Heart Attacks and Statins are Not the Solution.” the works of Dr. Peter Langsjoen, and The Western A Price Foundation, for a full explanation of this problem. Statins come with a host of serious, potentially life threatening, vastly under-reported (DDB: doctor dismissive bias) side-effects, some irreversible, even ater discontinuing them.
Like Rabdymylosis.
Basically, your skeletal muscles melt, you turn into a pile of jello, and you risk kidney failure. It can start well after you stop taking statins, can happen very quickly and is life threatening. Kind of reminds me of the psychiatric drugs prescribed to treat depression which increase the risk of suicide. For a full treatment of why that happens, read Dr. Peter Gotzsche’s book, “Deadly Medicine and Organize Crime; How big pharma has corrupted healthcare.”
Crazy right? No. Standard operating procedure in the drug industry, which has twisted the results in statin studies for decades. Risk benefit analysis grade on statins: Fail. Risk benefit analysis on vaccines. Fail.
Who actually thinks these people, who regularly play with the peer-review process to increase their profits at our expense, are suddenly going to become angels when they are manufacturing vaccines, where they have ZERO liability? At least with statins, you can sue them. Although. That won’t give you your melted muscles back.

NIH Headline Misleading

Wakefield admits fabricating events when he took children’s blood samples

Excerpt from article which shows the event referenced in the headline was birthday party where Dr. Wakefield was making jokes — not admitting to “fabricating events.””Last week the GMC panel saw video footage of a speech Dr Wakefield gave in 1999 at a meeting of parents of autistic children called by the Mind Institute of the University of California, Davis, where he jokingly described children fainting and vomiting after giving blood.

“ ‘Two children fainted, one threw up over his mother,” he told his laughing audience in the clip. “People said to me, you can’t do that—children won’t come back to your birthday parties. I said we live in a market economy; next year they’ll want £10.’ ”

“But Dr Wakefield told the GMC panel that he had made up these details to amuse his listeners. “It was the end of a long and rather exacting talk for the parents, and it was an attempt to introduce a little bit of levity,” he said. “It was a quip, just a story. The way these stories are told, if the audience responds you tend to respond back. So the story was told. But it had no bearing on the truth at all.”

My thoughts:

This is one of many examples of how various entities have, themselves “fabricated events” surrounding Dr. Wakefield and the Lancet paper which got him run out of the public square. The entire debate has been mischaracterized. I notice that those who are most indignant about what they suppose Dr. Wakefield has allegedly done, have taken their “evidence” from second and third hand reports, often Big Pharma shills. Any doctor who dares breath one word against the Religion of Vaccines can expect the same kind of Inquisition.

Thankfully, Dr. Wakefield is a man of courage and integrity. I am confident he will have his day in court. As for parents. The vaccine manufacturers are going to find themselves up the proverbial creek without a paddle if they continue going after children. They haven’t yet seen the full fury of protective, angry moms and dads. “Healthy People 2020” or not…(look it up)

The Truth wins in the end. The question is, how many people suffer in the meantime. Hopefully the suffering of innocent children and devastated families will be coming to an end soon.

The science is settled….right?

Excerpted from “How to End the Autism Epidemic” by JB Handley

“David Kirby, former New York Times investigative journalist and the award-winning author of Evidence of Harm, is the only journalist I have seen who actually understands the extreme limitations of the completed science, and here’s how he explains it:

” ‘To begin with, it is unscientific and perilously misleading for anyone to assert that ‘vaccines and autism’  have been studied and that no link has been found. That’s because the 16 or so studies constantly cited by critics of the hypothesis have examined just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient.… It is illogical to exonerate all vaccines, all vaccine ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient. It is akin to claiming that every form of animal protein is beneficial to people, when all you have studied is fish.’ “